Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Assignment 6 - Modern Astronomy

            Telescopes were used to enhance vision for better observations of our universe since the 16th and 17th centuries. When the 18th century came around, the telescope was the go-to instrument to explore the universe with just the naked eye. It allowed people to observe such distant objects that would otherwise unseen by the naked eye, this allowed for such huge advancements in this field of science. As the 20th century began, many astronomers believed that the universe only consisted of one galaxy: the Milky Way. But, in 1924, an American astronomer, Edwin Hubble, disputed this belief and believed that there were galaxies than just our own. He used the Hooker telescope on Mount Wilson in California to observe so many other galaxies that were all moving away from each other. This observation triggered to raise a theory of how the universe was constantly expanding. Many astronomers spent many nights in observatories using telescopes to help prove this theory and possibly find out more unknown facts about the universe, however, there was a major obstacle that prevented them from getting a clear image of the universe: the Earth’s atmosphere.

            The Earth’s atmosphere blurs visible light, which causes brighter stars to twinkle, hence making it harder to observe dimmer stars in comparison. In addition, the atmosphere absorbs or totally blocks other wavelengths of light such as ultraviolent, infrared, gamma rays, and X-rays (to actually protect us from the harmful effects of these types of light rays). This is also why observatories have telescopes near the tops of mountains to prevent any disruptions caused by city lights. In 1923, Hermann Oberth (a German scientist), published a paper that proposed a telescope being propelled into Earth’s orbit with the use of a rocket to bypass the obstacle of the Earth’s atmosphere in observations. A Princeton astrophysicist Lyman Spitzer then wrote about his support about the scientific benefits of a telescope above the Earth’s atmosphere in 1946. Subsequently, as the Soviets launched their satellite Sputnik in 1957, NASA followed suit and launched two Orbital Astronomical Observatories (OAOs) into orbit. This allowed for further research into more space observatories and allowed them to make many ultraviolet observations.

            As a result, in 1969 after Spitzer gathered support of other astronomers, the National Academy of Sciences approved a project for a Large Space Telescope (LST). Although, with the “race to the moon” by the Soviets and the Americans, much of NASA space program funding went into their expedition and landing on the moon in 1969, which put the project for a LST in jeopardy. This caused numerous budget reductions into the building of the LST but in 1974, the LST had specifications to have a wavelength range from ultraviolet to infrared light and it had the ability to resolve at least one-tenth of an arcsecond.

            After finally building the LST, the next issue was how NASA was going to launch it into space. NASA and its partners began to think of something that could launch an object into orbit but then return to Earth, in order to be reused over and over again, this resulted in the concept of the space shuttle. NASA predicted that the lifetime of a space telescope would be approximately fifteen years, which raised the issue of having the ability to service the satellite while it is in orbit. They began to develop tools and parts that were high quality but did not harm the satellite’s orbit due to its size; too many instruments (especially large ones) decreased any chances of financial support. NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) exchanged fifteen percent of telescope time for fifteen percent of the funding for the LST. By 1977, Congress approved the funding and construction began.

            NASA began to then assign tasks for specific NASA field centres. First, the Marshall Space Flight Centre in Huntsville, Alabama was chosen for the design, development, and construction for the newly named Space Telescope (ST). Next, the Goddard Space Flight Centre in Greenbelt, Maryland was chosen to be the lead in scientific instrument design and ground control for the space observatory. Lastly, the Johnson Space Centre in Houston, Texas and the Kennedy Space Centre in Florida provided Space Shuttle support. Maintenance and any upgrades of the space telescope were decided to be done while in orbit as opposed to on Earth to save funding and by 1985 the telescope was renamed the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and was ready for launch. Unfortunately, in 1986, an accident required NASA to ground the satellite but the bright spot was the enhancements that were made to the equipment on the satellite including the solar panels, computers, and communication systems. Following many stress tests to improve durability, the HST was brought into orbit on April 24, 1990 by the Space Shuttle Discovery.1

            The Hubble Space Telescope has been in orbit for more than twenty years now and with recent services done to the telescope, it is predicted that the HST would last at least five more years. The telescope has resulted in many discoveries that have greatly impacted the field of science. Two discoveries it has made are dark matter and dark energy, two new fields that have now many physicists exploring these new topics. Dark matter makes up for about twenty-three percent of the universe and is only known to exist based on gravity (it cannot be seen). Dark energy, on the other hand, helped to observe that the rate of expansion by the universe is accelerating as opposed to being constant or slowing down. In addition, the HST has made many important advances in field of extrasolar planets by even having the ability to determine the composition of their atmospheres.4 I have chosen these three results because it is so fascinating that beyond our world there many things that humans have not discovered and the way we perceive our world and our universe can change at any second especially with the way advancements in science seem to be trending upward at an astonishingly fast rate.

References:

No comments:

Post a Comment